|
Uncontrolled
development of Torphins would seriously affect the character and the
layout of the village.
It
must be said that we are not against development –
communities have to grow and diversify to sustain, but this should be
carried
out with respect to what makes a community – its character,
aspirations and
environment should be part of the development process. That is the only
reason that
we are here – to try and make sure that Torphins actually has
a say in its own
future.
The Issues
This Development Plan, as set out in Schedules 1 and 2, seemingly
ignores key points raised repeatedly by the 2009 residents survey. The
Save Torphins Group considers the main points to comprise:
Primary School Overcrowding
We are fortunate to have a fine Primary School in Torphins, but one
that is hampered by overcrowding. Class sizes are too high, and have
been for many years. In 2010 we have 236 pupils, despite the council
forecasting 200. The lack of a General Purposes room is also hindering
educational standards, with the Governments stated aim of lowering
class sizes, looking ever more difficult with the current set-up in
Torphins. The ongoing requirement which already exists for the
significant ‘temporary’ classrooms in the playground,
severely curtailing playground space, will have to continue without
further capital expenditure on the school infrastructure. This
contributes to Aberdeenshire’s ‘worst record in Scotland
for teaching children in temporary classrooms’- highlighted in
the recent P&J headline’ Shame of North East’s
Temporary Classrooms’.
The Development Plan states the extra housing is needed to sustain the
local school, based on its generalised assumption that new housing is
needed to maintain a steady school roll. This ignores the evidence that
Torphins rolls for Primary age have held up and beat predicted levels
for years; the Nurseries (School and Sunshine) and Playgroup are full.
The transient nature of the population and mobility trends of the oil
and gas industry employment is the over-riding factor- families move in
and out of the village, occupying older housing stock, such that the
school stays full despite there having been no significant amounts of
new housing for many years.

The
Development Planners indicate that they are aware of this, as the
proposed development is expected to result in additional pupils from
the Torphins site being needed to be accommodated at Aboyne School at
Secondary stage (as shown in Schedule 3 Table 2) –so this school
will therefore need expanding. However, this logic implies that the M1
site will also supply ADDITIONAL pupils to Torphins Primary in excess
of the current numbers, and yet there appears no plan to expand the
overcrowded Torphins School site, or replace it with a new school.
The latest information in the Piper on 3rd Sept indicates that
Primaries across the shire are expected to see a 2.8% increase in pupil
numbers by 2016.
To maintain the high educational standards expected by Torphins
residents, and sought under the Curriculum for Excellence, this lack of
thought given to the school in the planning needs to be
addressed. The time for the general assertion around school rolls
is over, the council need to look at the facts, as presented by many of
the residents during the Main Issues report consultation.
The Proposed Plan also ignores the increase in housing that is already
in prospect, based on existing planning permissions or applications;
housing near the Station Garage site on the east of the village, and on
the present garage paint shop site in the village centre. These
imminent changes will potentially increase pupil numbers.
Therefore, the Plan Schedule 3, ‘Likely Infrastructure
Needs’, completely ignores the overcrowded primary school issue
in proposing such a development on M1.
There are undoubtedly communities in the Shire where pupil numbers are
falling and their schools are struggling to be viable; surely these
communities are where the new housing should be targeted.
Character
and Setting
The Councils response to Torphins’ residents noted the variety of
concerns by many residents that the proposed developments, especially
those west of the village centre would detrimentally affect Torphins
character. The Plan is supposed to have as a basis that ‘local
history helps create a clear identity’- Policy 13
‘Protecting, improving, and conserving the historic
environment’ but Torphins unique historical landscape aspect i.e.
agricultural land at the heart of the village, will be lost. This also
goes against Policy 12 ‘Landscape conservation’, which
seeks to ‘to improve local and regional identity’; we would
be just another village with a traditional centre surrounded by modern
development. The SG1-Landscape character Guidance document to Policy 12
also states that ‘where a landscape character area is largely
unspoiled by obtrusive or discordant man-made features, development of
other man-made structures or features should generally be
avoided’. The south-western aspect of Torphins would seem to be
such an area.
The Scottish Government is supposed to attach great weight on
protecting our history through the planning system- according to Policy
13. In addition, ‘Policy 3- Development in the
countryside’, states that the Council will ‘manage
development in a way that recognises the special character of different
types of rural area’. It would be good to see recognition of
Torphins’ history in this Plan.
Sewage Treatment Plant
capacity
This factor is linked to the previous infrastructure issues- the plant
capacity has room for only another 60 dwellings, before the current
infill plans are implemented. Although ‘developer
contribution’ is expected to assist the expansion of this plant,
will this be possible without a larger development on the west Torphins
site being required to make such worthwhile? Therefore the Schedule 3-
Developer Contribution- could well add to the drive to enlargement of
the M1 site.
We are very concerned about the knock-on effect situation which could
arise, with any developer only being able to provide funds for water
treatment works upgrading if they were to be given additional land to
develop.
Impractical plan
for the space indicated
The Plan proposes that 50 houses, retail and employment land in will be
fitted into the M1 area – this seems impractical when one
considers the hall extension and parking. The concern is that, in
order to accommodate the practical requirements of these developments,
more land will be required.
By starting a new development front on the village’s southwest
aspect, then further encroachment is inevitable. The M1 site has no
natural boundaries to constrain development to the west.
Impact on the local shops
The plan is meant to encourage further retail development in the
countryside where this does not have a detrimental effect on local
businesses- as set out in Policy 2-‘Town centres and
retailing’. The unique Torphins attribute of a traditional retail
cluster about the original village centre crossroads, would be
threatened by a new retail development west of the Learney Hall-
especially if this were to be a mini-supermarket. With the Scotmid Coop
having recently announced its intent to move from its current shop to
that occupied by Mother Hubbards on the SE corner of the cross roads,
there is no need or call to add more retail and jeopardise the survival
of the existing small shops.
How
to submit comments
It is possible to comment on the Proposed Plan itself, or the
Supplementary Guidance which is meant to guide the Planners. It is the
view of SAVE Torphins that the Plan itself is at fault and needs
amending, by the removal of the M1 site and the reduction of the level
of new housing to that to be supplied by infill.
The Plan does not take proper account of the Council’s own
Policies and Supplementary Guidance, and certainly does not reflect the
wishes of the residents of Torphins or the realities of the village and
the site. If you agree then we suggest you should make comments on the
Plan, on the appropriate Response Form. This is downloadable from the
Council website as above, or from our own site at www.savetorphins.org.
|
|